Walk

 

"Illustration" courtesy of:  https://www.craiyon.com "handcuffs"

We refuse to assert that:

• "Businesses 'just let' individuals 'drive by' or 'walk in' and steal."

The illogical conclusion to that non-assertion is:

• "Preventing 'loss' or 'theft' requires more 'security'."

Increasing security measures "a little" won't "cut it".  They have to be inescapable or ubiquitous.  You can't be trusted.

Our logic is backward or deniable:

• No previous attempt to prevent or stop "stealing" or theft using cameras or technology has ever failed.
• The technology simply wasn't "done right" or "ready".
• Theft will no longer be possible or worthwhile after a minimum "level of technology" or "number of cameras" is reached.

Backward or "refrain from 'picking' your nose or 'seat'".