Pets

Human beings aren't typically "happy" without "choice".  Neither are "pets".

Does an individual "responsible" for "other living creatures" give them the choice they need?  They should "every time" or never.

Human beings have issues with "wants" but that's "on us".  We're unnecessarily complicated compared to other "creatures".

We have 2 or 3 questions:

- Should an individual "responsible" for "pets" "make" them "get up on the couch" whenever they "want"?

- Should an individual "responsible" for "pets" "make" them go "outside" or "inside" whenever they "want"?

- Any individual who seeks to "control" or "dominate" "pets" deserves to be "responsible" for "one or more".

Excuse us for getting one backward.

Unapologetically.