Evil

Have you ever heard the assertion:

• "'Voting' for the lesser of 2 or 3 'evils' is still voting for 'evil'?"

"Voting" for a candidate is typically encouraged whether an individual agrees with the entire "platform" or "policies" presented.

There may or may not be an "ideal candidate".

Let's ask a random "politician" to do things backward:

• Decline to give or take a "position" on every "thing".
• Limit their "platform" to those "things" they didn't decline.
• Abstain from those "things" or "defer" them to "others".

Voters may or may not know "everything" about each candidate.  The more one knows, the less one likes?

Backward or uncompromising.