Funded

"Illustration" courtesy of:  Council on Foreign Relations

What logic or reason explains "arming" another country or nation for a conflict which should have been settled before it started?  Is there cause or justification to directly act or intervene?

Of course not.

Only those "firing on" each other are affected or impacted.  Everyone else can then "bemoan" or "tsk-tsk" with or without a "guilt-free" conscience.

We callously argue that:

• "There are no individuals alive anywhere else whose basic needs are not being met."

All are well "funded" or "provided" for.  If the contrary were true, then funds would be allocated or help provided.

Backward or "we didn't include an image of a 'homeless' individual or 'starving' child".