Geffen

This is an "alleged" story:

• Executives or individuals in at least one or none "industries" have an "attraction" to members of the opposite or same gender.
• Said individuals may or may not "abuse" or "employ" "suggestion" for the purpose of:
• "Sorting" the "wheat from the chaff."
• "Streamlining" or "simplifying" "conversation" or "courtship".
• "Ensuring" or "guaranteeing" that a "minor" or "underage" individual doesn't "unknowingly" become "involved".

Which of those 3 purposes is backward?

Here's part of an "alleged" suggestion to provide "context":

• "... if you or they are 'too young'..."

We are of the opinion this leaves "the door" cracked or open "in excess".

Why?

We're pretty sure the law defines "not old enough" using a specific number of years.

It's not left up to a teenager (or younger) to "decide for themself".